Made In India

What's NOT made in China for a change, are civil rights. Yup, you heard right. Nick Bryant, the BBC's South Asia correspondent just wrote a book entitled The Bystander: John F Kennedy and the Struggle for Black Equality. The entire book was written during his sojourn in South Asia. So what does the civil rights movement in the US have to do with India? Well, quite a bit, actually. Bryant writes:

As I quickly discovered, many of the main heroes of the book - the often isolated officials in the Kennedy administration who called repeatedly for the President to mount a much more aggressive assault on racial segregation in the American south - all spent formative portions of their careers in India.

They were committed Indophiles - or more accurately, Gandhiphiles.

And that includes Chester Bowles, the Deputy Secretary of State in the Kennedy administration who was ambassador to India and Nepal in the 1950s. The recently deceased and controversial economist John Kenneth Galbraith who was also ambassador to India during the Kennedy era and, in fact, was in Delhi when the race riots broke out in the US in 1963. Harris Wofford, JFK's short-lived chief civil rights adviser, visited India in the late 40s, and even published a book India Afire with his wife, Clare. And, of course, Martin Luther King, Jr. who made his respect for the teachings of Gandhi quite well-known, made the trip to India in 1959.

"To other countries I may go as a tourist," he declared on touching down at Delhi airport, "but to India I come as a pilgrim."

It's good to know that the repercussions of Gandhi's philosophy still continue even now. The average American, hearing that you are from India (I speak from personal experience here), will ask you either about snake-charming, the caste system or about Gandhi, depending on his social status and education level. Notwithstanding the first two, it is at least somewhat comforting to know that at least one Indian has had this much of a positive impact at the global level and still continues to do so, decades after his death.

Gandhi had a special significance in my life. The matriarch of my family (my surrogate great-grandmother) was a staunch Gandhian and whenever Gandhi came to Bombay he used to visit her. She was even on the boat that went out to sprinkle his ashes at the confluence of the three holy rivers. Because of her, most of my family members have small vials of Gandhi's ashes (with authentification certificates, no less). She never consumed a drop of coffee or tea in her life, she never ate meat, she spun the yarn that she used to make her khadi sarees and she started her day at 4am every morning for most of her adult life. She lived until the ripe old age of 87, outliving several of her younger relatives. She used to go regularly to villages in India helping set up schools, wells and advocating women's rights. Like Gandhi, she only traveled by second class, unreserved. Unlike Gandhi, however, she did not have the entire coach reserved for her. If you have ever traveled by Indian Railways, you will have an idea of how rough that is. She did it until she was close to 84 when her health started getting in the way. Her name was Maniben Nanavati. Check out the link - it's unfortunate that that is her only online presence and certainly, I am going to try and change that. And if you are from Vile Parle in Bombay, it's the same Maniben Nanavati after whom the Women's College is named.

Needless to say, with women like that bringing up my family's elders, Gandhian principles were drilled into our heads from a very young age. And because of it (or perhaps, in spite of it) I strongly believe that his philosophy is still valid today. Certainly, I am not advocating the lifestyle that my great-grandmother lived (admirable as it was), and neither am I advocating total non-violence, but there are several aspects of his philosophy which are still quite applicable. The principles by which he lived and those he advocated are certainly valid. Those include self-reliance, religious tolerance and in certain situations, yes, non-violence. Hey, from this quote (from the eight-volume biography by Dinanath Tendulkar), we can even guess what his views on intellectual property and blogging were:

Writings in the journals which I have the privilege of editing must be common property.

Gandhi was a complicated man and an ambitious one. His ultimate goal was to rid India of British rule and influence politics without becoming a politician himself. He left that to Nehru, Patel and Jinnah, to name a few. The control he had over the people of India was tremendous and I seriously doubt that he could have achieved that by becoming a politico. He was at best, a spiritual leader and, at worst, a religious (but non-violent and tolerant) extremist. To achieve his goals, he shrewdly did what he had to do. If that involved preaching by example, then that included living his life the way he lived it. Perhaps, that is a tad extreme for you and me living today's 21st century lifestyle (hell, I don't want to give up my laptop!). But I do believe that the principles behind that life still ring true. Evidence of that is all around us, including the article I talked about above.

Although Gandhi was certainly made in India, I think that he would have been quick to remind us that his principles were anything but that. They were universal.